WIFE RECEIVES IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00 IN DIVORCE CASE AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PETERSBURG, MENARD COUNTY, LINCOLN, LOGAN COUNTY, CLINTON, DE WITT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A DIVORCE CASE WHERE THE WIFE RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00. THE PARTIES HAD BEEN MARRIED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND THE HUSBAND HAD EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS WITH SEVERAL WOMEN. HIS WIFE HAD ENOUGH OF IT. THE JUDGE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE HUSBAND BASICALLY MANIPULATED INFORMATION AND TESTIMONY IN HIS BEST INTERESTS AND THAT HE LACKED CREDIBILITY. THE WIFE COULD HAVE SETTLED FOR LESS. HOWEVER, BY PROCEEDING WITH THE MATTER THROUGH TRIAL, THE WIFE ENDED UP WITH A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER RESULT THAT HAD BEEN OFFERED BY THE HUSBAND, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
Blake Law Group
January 28, 2022
WIFE RECEIVES IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00 IN DIVORCE CASE AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PETERSBURG, MENARD COUNTY, LINCOLN, LOGAN COUNTY, CLINTON, DE WITT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A DIVORCE CASE WHERE THE WIFE RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00. THE PARTIES HAD BEEN MARRIED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND THE HUSBAND HAD EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS WITH SEVERAL WOMEN. HIS WIFE HAD ENOUGH OF IT. THE JUDGE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE HUSBAND BASICALLY MANIPULATED INFORMATION AND TESTIMONY IN HIS BEST INTERESTS AND THAT HE LACKED CREDIBILITY. THE WIFE COULD HAVE SETTLED FOR LESS. HOWEVER, BY PROCEEDING WITH THE MATTER THROUGH TRIAL, THE WIFE ENDED UP WITH A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER RESULT THAT HAD BEEN OFFERED BY THE HUSBAND, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
Over $375,000.00 saved – resolution reached with the Internal Revenue Service. We were hired by a client who had previously paid in excess of $20,000.00 to a national tax representation firm that advertised on the media throughout the United States. Nothing had been accomplished that benefitted the client. After we took over, we immediately began communicating with the Internal Revenue Service, worked out a resolution, saved our client hundreds of thousands of dollars, kept out client in business and our client was grateful for the results obtained. We had recommended to our client that a new accountant be retained and we made a referral to a local accountant and tax return preparer. We filed suit against the national tax firm to recover substantial amounts on behalf of our client. We isolated the old corporation and then created a new limited liability company, to basically continue with the customers in regard to future work. This strategy saved our client in excess of $4000,000.00. There was no criminal prosecution. We worked closely with our client for a period of time which included frequent office conferences, correspondence and telephone calls. At each step of the way our client was in contact with us regarding issues and concerns. We used a team approach which, in this case, meant that since more than one attorney was working on the file, someone was always available to respond to the concerns of the client and/or handle communications with the Internal Revenue Service. We treated the Internal Revenue Service. We treated the Internal Revenue Service with respect and responded to all telephone calls and inquiries. We explained to our client that the Internal Revenue Service has a job to do which is basically follow the law.
Related Posts
$75,000.00 UNPAID CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM WATERLOO, MONROE COUNTY, NASHVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, BREESE, CLINTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OUR CLIENT HAD BEEN MARRIED TO AN ANHEUSER BUSH EXECUTIVE. THERE WAS A CLAUSE IN THE DIVORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT PROVIDED THAT OUR CLIENT WAS TO RECEIVE CHILD SUPPORT WITH AN ADDITIONAL BONUS OR OVERRIDE BASED ON INCREASES IN INCOME OF HER HIGHLY PAID FORMER SPOUSE. UNKNOWN AND UNDISCLOSED TO OUR CLIENT, HER FORMER SPOUSE RECEIVED SUBSTANTIAL STOCK OPTIONS AFTER THE DIVORCE. COUNSEL FOR THE FORMER SPOUSE CLAIMED THAT THE STOCK OPTIONS WERE NOT INCOME AND THEREFORE WERE NOT SUBJECT TO THE OVERRIDE OR BONUS FOR ADDITIONAL CHILD SUPPORT. WE CONDUCTED DISCOVERY. WE OBTAINED COPIES OF TAX RETURNS. THE TAX RETURNS OF THE FORMER SPOUSE PROVED THAT HE HAD CONSIDERED SAME AS INCOME SINCE THEY WERE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH ON HIS TAX RETURNS. WE RECOVERED IN EXCESS OF $75,000 FOR OUR CLIENT, POSSIBLY ONE OF THE LARGEST BACK CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERIES FOR AN EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
$195,000.00+ RECOVERY IN MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ESTATE AND TRUST DISPUTE CASE, THERE WAS A CLAIM THAT THE SECOND WIFE, STEPMOTHER TO OUR CLIENTS, TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HER HUSBAND TO BASICALLY DISINHERIT HIS NATURAL CHILDREN, THIS CASE INVOLVED DURESS, UNDUE INFLUENCE, LACK OF MENTAL CAPACITY AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH AN INHERITANCE EXPECTANCY, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM TAZEWELL COUNTY, MARQUETTE HEIGHTS, PEKIN AND WASHINGTON, MCLEAN COUNTY, BLOOMINGTON, CHENOA AND LEXINGTON, FORD COUNTY, GIBSON CITY, PAXTON AND PIPER CITY, ILLINOIS.
BELLEVILLE, DIVORCE LAWYER, GRANDPARENT’S RIGHTS, DECEASED PARENT, INCARCERATED PARENT, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (DCFS), UNPAID CHILD SUPPORT, UNMARRIED PARENTS, CIVIL CONTEMPT, KIDNAPING, ABDUCTION, DIVORCE APPEALS, SAME-SEX DIVORCE, DIVORCE TRIALS, GRANDPARENT VISITATION APPEALS, DIVORCE DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS, RULE TO SHOW CAUSE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS, CHILD SUPPORT APPEALS SEPARATION ISSUES, BIGAMY, GUARDIANSHIP, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS DIVORCE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM COBDEN, UNION COUNTY, VIENNA, JOHNSON COUNTY, GOLCONDA, POPE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM THE WINCHESTER, ILLINOIS AREA, TRUSTED WILL ADMINISTRATION, PROBATE AND TRUST ADMINISTRATION LAWYER, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS IN WINCHESTER, SCOTT COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXPERIENCED ESTATE PLANNING, ELDER LAW AND WILL AND TRUST ATTORNEYS. EXPERIENCED ATTORNEYS FOR PROBATE AND ESTATE ADMINISTRATION PROCESS, REPRESENTATION OF CLIENTS THAT LIVE OUT-OF-STATE, EXPERIENCED METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM WINCHESTER, SCOTT COUNTY, ILLINOIS, TRIAL ATTORNEYS ESTATE PLANNING, ELDER LAW AND WILLS AND TRUSTS.
ILLINOIS FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY, ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, PARENTING TIME, PRIMARY PARENT, RELOCATION, PRIMARY RESIDENCE, PARENTAL NOTICE, DISSIPATION, DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, CONTESTED DIVORCE, UNCONTESTED DIVORCE, LEGAL SEPARATION, ANNULMENT, MEDIATION, PATERNITY, HIGH ASSET DIVORCE, CHANGE OF NAME, ORDERS OF PROTECTION, PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS, POSTNUPTIAL AGREEMENTS, CHILD CUSTODY BATTLES, RELOCATION TO DIFFERENT STATE, RELOCATION TO DIFFERENCE COUNTY, STEP-PARENT’S RIGHTS, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS FAMILY LAW FIRM AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM QUINCY, ADAMS COUNTY, HAMILTON, HANCOCK COUNTY, RUSHVILLE, SCHUYLER COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, METRO EAST FAMILY LAW REPRESENTATION, ORDERS OF PROTECTION, CHILD CUSTODY BATTLES, STEP-PARENT RIGHTS, PARENTING TIME, UNPAID CHILD SUPPORT, RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS, QDRO, QILDRO, QUIT CLAIM DEEDS, DIVORCE, ESTATE PLANNING, AVVO 10.0 RATING, LEADING LAWYER, MILLION DOLLAR ADVOCATES FORUM, BEST ATTORNEYS OF AMERICA, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LEGAL ADVOCATES TOP 100 FAMILY LAWYERS IN ILLINOIS, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS, MARTINDALE HUBBELL AV PREEMINENT RATED, SUPER LAWYERS, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM JASPER COUNTY, NEWTON, WHEELER AND WILLOW HILL, CRAWFORD COUNTY, ROBINSON, OBLONG AND PALESTINE, LAWRENCE COUNTY, LAWRENCEVILLE, SUMNER AND BRIDGEPORT, ILLINOIS.